VERN 2.0 Rebuilt from the ground up, everything below is new

You decide what counts as risk.

Same clause, same contract. Vern scores it against your own playbook, never a market average, and shows you the wording to send back.

Book the thirty minutes See pricing

Who this is for Anyone who has to read a contract somebody else wrote

PLAYBOOKS WE HAVE ALREADY BUILT

Recruitment Client Terms of Business, rebates and transfer fees Professional services Client MSAs and SOWs, liability and IP Procurement Supplier paper, renewals and uplift clauses SaaS and tech Your own MSA, coming back redlined

Vern reads any commercial contract in English, and where a sector is new to us we build the playbook from contracts you have already signed. The comparison page is honest about where we are not the right answer.

Client Terms of Business · Meridian Talent Ltd

Eighteen clauses.
Five worth your afternoon.

OVERALL

62 Negotiate

VERN

Caution

CLAUSE PLAYBOOK VERN

DEEP REVIEW COMPLETE · CITATIONS ANCHORED · 2m 47s CYCLING EVERY CLAUSE · CLICK ONE TO STOP

8.1 Limitation of liability

FINDING

Liability for indirect and consequential losses is uncapped. Your playbook requires a cap at or below 2× annual fees. Vern rates the clause weak as drafted, a UK court would likely read the carve-out against the drafter.

IMPACT

Unlimited exposure on a £48k engagement; sits outside your £2m aggregate insurance cover.

SUGGESTED WORDING Playbook L-04 · accepted 78% of the time

"Each party’s total aggregate liability under this Agreement shall not exceed an amount equal to twice the fees paid or payable in the twelve months preceding the claim."

Then apply it as a real tracked change in Word →

88 Accept

Playbook Score

Does this clause match the position you set? Nought to a hundred, banded Accept, Negotiate or Escalate. Filled pill, everywhere in the product, without exception.

Strong

Vern Score

Would it actually hold up under UK law? Strong, Caution or Weak, judged independently of what you'd accept. Outlined pill, always. Nobody else gives you this one.

Then you watch the numbers move.

Redline it from inside Word. Their version comes back as round three. Vern re-scores and shows you only the deltas.

ROUND 3 RE-SCORED · 4 CHANGES · 14 UNTOUCHED

8.1 LIABILITY

12 58

Capped at 2× after our redline

5.2 PAYMENT

54 31

They pushed it to 75 days

9.4 COVENANTS

41 41

Untouched

17.2 ASSIGNMENT

New clause

Appeared in round three

FOLLOW-UP ROUND · 0.5 CREDITS · FOURTEEN CLAUSES UNCHANGED, UNREAD, UNBILLED

Seven ways in.
One record.

01 Word add-in Real tracked changes their counsel can accept or reject. Never cosmetic strikethrough.

02 Round diffing Their redline arrives as version three. Read the four clauses that moved, not all eighteen again.

03 Email-in Forward it from anyone you've approved. Verified senders only, never an open door.

04 Ask Vern Chat that fetches the clause and your position with tools before it answers. Not a summary.

05 Drafting Generate a first draft that already holds your positions, into a blank Word document.

06 ChatGPT and Claude Ask the assistant you already use to review a contract. It calls Vern, so the answer comes from your playbook, not the model's guess.

07 Our API Documented, versioned, with signed webhooks on completion. Put Vern inside your own systems.

We match the specialists. We don't price like them.

CAPABILITY

Vern

ChatGPT / Claude

Contract AI

Enterprise CLM

Scores against your own playbook

Separate enforceability score

Real Word tracked changes

Round-by-round clause diffing

Works from inside ChatGPT or Claude

UK/EU data residency guaranteed

Priced for your needs, your business

● Full ◐ Partial or paid add-on · Not offered Every head-to-head →

Proof you can check

Don't take our word for it. Take your own contract.

Thirty minutes, one of your own agreements, scored against your positions while you watch. You will know by the third clause whether this is worth your afternoon.

AND WHAT IT COSTS TO FIND OUT

Nothing. After that it is priced per review and invoiced monthly, with no card on file and nothing spent on a review that fails. See how a package is built →

01 Everything procurement asks, already published Read the trust centre →

02 A company you can look up Who builds it →

03 Every change, dated Read the changelog →

04 When Vern gets it wrong

Every finding cites the clause it came from, and a review that fails or times out costs you nothing. Legal information, not legal advice.

You will not find a time-saving percentage, an accuracy rate or a trusted-by-thousands line anywhere on this site. We have not run the study that would justify one, so we are not going to print one.

Their paper. Your margin.

Thirty minutes, one of your own contracts, scored against your positions while you watch.