Everything that moved.

One clause at a time, or every suggested wording in the contract under a single tracked edit.

Jump the cursor to the clause a finding came from, and leave the reasoning as a Word comment. The wording is the redline; the reasoning is the comment. Never both in the same place.

Where two clauses read alike, or the document has moved on since the review, Vern refuses to edit and leaves a comment instead. Measured against a corpus of deliberately awkward contracts, it has never edited the wrong clause.

If somebody typed "8.1" rather than using Word’s numbering, it keeps its formatting and never shows up as part of your change.

If the document has changed since Vern read it, the panel says so and offers a re-check rather than quietly working from the old text.

A paragraph the other side had moved appeared twice in the text Vern read. It doesn't now, and there's a regression test so it can't come back.

A fast pass puts a verdict against every clause within seconds, then the deep pass upgrades each one in place. You start reading before Vern has finished.

Generate the code in the dashboard, type it into the panel once. Single use, ten minutes, revocable from settings. No password in Word, ever.

Open a contract Vern has already read and the review comes straight back into the panel. No new run, no credit, no waiting.

The dashboard is just another client of it. Keys are shown once, stored hashed, and carry only the scopes you grant them.

Publishing snapshots a version. Every past review keeps the version it was scored against, so changing a position today never rewrites what you decided last quarter.

Provider errors used to reach you verbatim. Now you get plain English, a free retry, and no credit spent.

Playbook Score for whether the clause matches the position you set. Vern Score for whether it would hold up under UK law, judged independently of what you would accept.

Quotes are round-tripped against the document. An anchor that can't be verified is dropped rather than approximated, so checking a finding is a glance instead of a re-read.

Clauses that contradict each other, like an uncapped indemnity that walks straight through your liability cap, plus the positions your playbook requires that the contract never mentions at all.

"Fees" meaning something different in clause 3 than it does in clause 8 is the sort of thing that costs money quietly.

Reserved at intake, spent on delivery. Failures, timeouts and re-runs on the same version are free, and a later round of the same deal is charged at the follow-up rate.

Runs sit on a durable queue. Deploy in the middle of a sixty-page contract and it carries on from where it was, without charging you twice.

Decimal, letters, roman, multi-level, restarts. The number you see in Word is the number Vern cites.

The text layer is read directly where there is one; a thin-text scan routes to OCR instead of being read as three words a page.

Text hidden by formatting, or white on white, is either excluded and flagged or kept and flagged. Nothing invisible passes through silently.

Parsing runs in a separate process holding no keys at all. Contract text is treated as data, never as instructions, including the instructions somebody hid in white-on-white.

25 MB, around 300 pages, PDF and Word only, and the file type is sniffed from the bytes rather than trusted from the name.

Detected at the door and refused with a message, rather than dying halfway through and charging nobody's favourite kind of nothing.

Anchored to one review. It pulls the clause, your playbook position and the surrounding text with tools before it answers, so it quotes rather than remembers, and it can only ever read the contract you have open.

Same conversation, same thread, without leaving the document. Switch tabs and the answer you were reading is still there.

No credits, no per-message charge, no quota. Asking a follow-up question about a review you have already paid for shouldn't be a decision.

Every organisation gets its own inbound address. Forward a PDF or a Word file and the review comes back on the same thread. Anything from a sender you haven't approved is dropped silently, so a spoofed address never gets an answer.

Invite the people who only ever forward an email. No seat, no login, revocable in one click, and named individually. We don't trust a whole domain because one person at it is a customer.

The full summary with both scores per clause, or a bare confirmation that it landed and the findings are in the dashboard. Set per organisation, because not everyone who forwards a contract should read the analysis of it.

If it ends up somewhere it shouldn't, an admin can replace it. The old one dies immediately, and a forwarded contract can't be duplicated into two reviews by a retry.