Choose the review that fits your team.

GoHeather also offers playbooks, Word redlining, contract chat and version comparison. Vern brings your own positions, two separate clause scores and negotiation rounds together for the people handling the deal.

Choose Vern when your team needs to get incoming contracts reviewed and agreed. Set out the terms you want, check each clause against them, and follow the changes as drafts go back and forth. Operations, finance and recruitment teams get a review they can use to decide their next move.

Spellbook gives law firms and in-house legal teams tools for review, drafting, playbooks and document comparison. Vern focuses on helping business teams review incoming agreements and negotiate against their own terms.

If operations, finance or recruitment handles your contracts, choose Vern for a review built around their decisions. Check incoming terms against your own positions, work through suggested changes in Word and keep reviewing as the negotiation moves on. You can run the process without an in-house legal department.

Ivo reviews contracts against company playbooks, builds playbooks from past agreements and supports review in Word and Google Docs. Vern brings a focused negotiation workflow to the business team handling incoming contracts.

Choose Vern when operations, finance or recruitment needs to get incoming contracts agreed. Your playbook sets the standard. The review shows where the terms fall short, and the next draft is checked against the same positions. Your team can work through routine agreements and bring in a solicitor where judgement is needed.

LEGALFLY offers playbook review, Word redlining and document comparison, with tools for procurement as well as legal teams. Vern centres the review on your terms, two separate scores and the rounds of the deal.

Choose Vern when reviewing and negotiating commercial terms is the job you need to get done. Set your preferred positions, check incoming agreements and work through suggested changes in Word. Separate clause scores help your team see both commercial fit and drafting concerns, while round comparisons show how the negotiation is moving.

Juro combines AI review with contract creation, approvals, negotiation, signing and storage. It also reviews third-party contracts in Word. Vern focuses on the terms, clause scores and negotiation rounds before you sign.

Choose Vern when your priority is reviewing the contract in front of you. Check it against your own positions, work through the proposed changes and follow each new draft. You can make Vern the review step in your existing process and keep using the tools you already have for signing and storage.

Robin paired real contract AI with a managed legal team, and for a while it worked well enough to reach around $10m of recurring revenue with enterprise names on the list. The premise was sound and close to ours: most review is mechanical, so automate that and keep lawyers for the exceptions.

Robin failed to raise in October 2025 and was listed for a distressed sale, carrying around 170 staff and three offices against that revenue. Scissero took the services arm, Microsoft hired the engineers, and nobody bought the software. We are the unbundled version and intend to stay small enough to survive: priced per review, no minimum team size, no legal team on our payroll, with expert review planned for a future release.

Lifecycle infrastructure at enterprise scale, repository, approvals, obligations, integrations, the lot. Nothing we build competes with that and nothing we build tries to.

We're a reviewer, not a system of record, and we're priced and deployed accordingly. Our API exists partly so a CLM can call us for the negotiation part and keep everything else.

Reading enormous quantities of documents and finding the pattern, diligence, portfolio reviews, migrations. Serious technology aimed at serious volume.

Different shape of buyer. A five-person team can be live in a week on a package sized for them, and the review is opinionated about your positions rather than neutral about the corpus.

Signature, and everything that hangs off it. It's the default for a reason, and it's usually already in the building before anyone asks about review.

We work before the signature, the part where the terms are still changeable. Send it to them once we've told you what to push back on.

Judgement, accountability and the ability to advise, which is not what we do and not what we claim. For anything genuinely contentious or bet-the-company, this is the right answer.

We're the first pass on the routine ninety per cent, at a fraction of the cost and in minutes rather than days, so the hours you do buy go on the deals that deserve them.